{"id":3380,"date":"2021-06-12T12:15:45","date_gmt":"2021-06-12T09:15:45","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.gunayerdogan.com.tr\/?p=3380"},"modified":"2023-10-14T17:50:04","modified_gmt":"2023-10-14T14:50:04","slug":"anayasa-mahkemesi-bulent-ozer-basvurusu-basvuru-no-2018-36896","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/gunayerdogan.com.tr\/en\/anayasa-mahkemesi-bulent-ozer-basvurusu-basvuru-no-2018-36896\/","title":{"rendered":"Anayasa Mahkemesi B\u00fclent \u00d6zer Ba\u015fvurusu (Ba\u015fvuru No: 2018\/36896)"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>Anayasa Mahkemesi, B\u00fclent \u00d6zer Ba\u015fvurusunda (Ba\u015fvuru No: 2018\/36896) temyiz isteminin dava de\u011ferinin temyiz s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131 alt\u0131nda kalmas\u0131 sebebiyle incelenmeksizin reddedilmesi nedeniyle mahkemeye eri\u015fim hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine karar verdi.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Ba\u015fvurucu; dava konusu ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n de\u011ferinin 28.000 TL de\u011fil 100.000 TL oldu\u011funu, B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesinin davan\u0131n bu niteli\u011fi sebebiyle temyiz yolu a\u00e7\u0131k olmak \u00fczere karar verdi\u011fini fakat temyiz talebinin temyiz s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131n\u0131n alt\u0131nda kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle reddedilmesinin adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131 ihlal etti\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Anayasa Mahkemesi ba\u015fvurucunun \u015fik\u00e2yetlerinin \u00f6z\u00fcn\u00fcn,&nbsp;<strong><em>a\u015f\u0131r\u0131 yararlanma<\/em>&nbsp;sebebiyle tapu iptal ve tescili talebiyle a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131 davada dava konusunun temyiz s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131n\u0131n alt\u0131nda kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle temyiz isteminin incelenmeksizin reddedilmesi<\/strong>&nbsp;oldu\u011funu tespit etmi\u015ftir. Bu itibarla ba\u015fvurucunun ihlal iddialar\u0131 adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n g\u00fcvencelerinden biri olan mahkemeye eri\u015fim hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda incelenmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Anayasa Mahkemesi&nbsp;<\/strong><strong>hakk\u0131n kapsam\u0131 ve m\u00fcdahalenin varl\u0131\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 de\u011ferlendirmede;<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Anayasa&#8217;n\u0131n 36. maddesinin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131nda, herkesin yarg\u0131 mercileri \u00f6n\u00fcnde davac\u0131 veya daval\u0131 olarak iddiada bulunma ve savunma hakk\u0131na sahip oldu\u011funu, dolay\u0131s\u0131yla mahkemeye eri\u015fim hakk\u0131, Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 36. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan hak arama \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn bir unsuru oldu\u011funu belirtmi\u015ftir. Di\u011fer yandan Anayasa&#8217;n\u0131n 36. maddesine &#8220;<em>adil yarg\u0131lanma<\/em>&#8221; ibaresinin eklenmesine ili\u015fkin gerek\u00e7ede, T\u00fcrkiye&#8217;nin taraf oldu\u011fu uluslararas\u0131 s\u00f6zle\u015fmelerce de g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n madde metnine d\u00e2hil edildi\u011fi vurgulanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. S\u00f6zle\u015fme&#8217;yi yorumlayan A\u0130HM, S\u00f6zle\u015fme&#8217;nin 6. maddesinin (1) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n mahkemeye eri\u015fim hakk\u0131n\u0131 i\u00e7erdi\u011fini belirtmektedir.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Anayasa&#8217;n\u0131n 36. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan hak arama \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc, bir temel hak olman\u0131n yan\u0131nda di\u011fer temel hak ve \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fcklerden gereken \u015fekilde yararlan\u0131lmay\u0131 ve bunlar\u0131n korunmas\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flayan en etkili g\u00fcvencelerden biridir. Bu bak\u0131mdan davan\u0131n bir mahkeme taraf\u0131ndan g\u00f6r\u00fclebilmesi ve ki\u015finin adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131na giren g\u00fcvencelerden faydalanabilmesi i\u00e7in ilk olarak ki\u015fiye iddialar\u0131n\u0131 ortaya koyma imk\u00e2n\u0131n\u0131n tan\u0131nmas\u0131 gerekir. Di\u011fer bir ifadeyle dava yoksa adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n sa\u011flad\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00fcvencelerden yararlanmak m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olmaz.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>\u00d6te yandan mahkemeye eri\u015fim hakk\u0131 ilk derece mahkemesine dava a\u00e7ma hakk\u0131n\u0131n yan\u0131 s\u0131ra itiraz, istinaf veya temyiz gibi kanun yollar\u0131na ba\u015fvurma imk\u00e2n\u0131 tan\u0131nm\u0131\u015f ise an\u0131lan yollara ba\u015fvurma hakk\u0131n\u0131 da i\u00e7erdi\u011fini belirtmi\u015ftir.<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Somut olayda tapu iptali ve tescili talebiyle a\u00e7\u0131lan davada temyiz talebinin temyiz s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131 alt\u0131nda kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle reddedilmesi nedeniyle ba\u015fvurucunun mahkemeye eri\u015fim hakk\u0131na y\u00f6nelik bir m\u00fcdahalede bulunuldu\u011funa karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Anayasa Mahkemesi m\u00fcdahalenin ihlal olu\u015fturup olu\u015fturmad\u0131\u011f\u0131yla ilgili olarak yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 de\u011ferlendirmede;<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>M\u00fcdahalenin, Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 13. Maddesinde&nbsp;belirtilen ko\u015fullar\u0131 yerine getirmedi\u011fi m\u00fcddet\u00e7e Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 36. maddesinin ihlalini te\u015fkil edece\u011fini belirtmi\u015ftir.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p><em>&#8220;Temel hak ve h\u00fcrriyetler, \u00f6zlerine dokunulmaks\u0131z\u0131n yaln\u0131zca Anayasan\u0131n ilgili maddelerinde belirtilen sebeplere ba\u011fl\u0131 olarak ve ancak kanunla s\u0131n\u0131rlanabilir. Bu s\u0131n\u0131rlamalar, Anayasan\u0131n s\u00f6z\u00fcne ve ruhuna, demokratik toplum d\u00fczeninin ve l\u00e2ik Cumhuriyetin gereklerine ve \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcl\u00fcl\u00fck ilkesine ayk\u0131r\u0131 olamaz.&#8221;<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Anayasan\u0131n 13. Maddesi uyar\u0131nca temel hak ve \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fckler, demokratik toplum d\u00fczeninin gereklerine ve \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcl\u00fcl\u00fck ilkesine ayk\u0131r\u0131 olmaks\u0131z\u0131n Anayasa&#8217;n\u0131n ilgili maddelerinde belirtilen sebeplere ba\u011fl\u0131 olarak ve ancak kanunla s\u0131n\u0131rlanabilir.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun&#8217;un 362. maddesinde,&nbsp;<strong>b\u00f6lge adliye mahkemelerinin miktar veya de\u011feri 40.000 TL&#8217;yi ge\u00e7meyen davalara ili\u015fkin kararlar\u0131 hakk\u0131nda temyiz yoluna ba\u015fvurulamayaca\u011f\u0131<\/strong>&nbsp;d\u00fczenlenmi\u015ftir. 492 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun&#8217;un 16. maddesinde&nbsp;<strong>tapu kay\u0131t iptali gibi gayrimenkul\u00fcn ayn\u0131na ili\u015fkin davalarda gayrimenkul\u00fcn de\u011ferinin dikkate al\u0131naca\u011f\u0131,<\/strong>&nbsp;s\u00f6z konusu de\u011ferin dava dilek\u00e7esinde davac\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan g\u00f6sterilmesi gerekti\u011fi, noksanl\u0131\u011f\u0131n tespit edildi\u011fi durumlarda ayn\u0131 Kanun&#8217;un 30. maddesinin uygulanaca\u011f\u0131 belirtilmi\u015ftir.&nbsp;<strong>An\u0131lan 30. maddeye g\u00f6re yarg\u0131lama s\u0131ras\u0131nda tespit olunan de\u011ferin dava dilek\u00e7esinde bildirilen de\u011ferden fazla oldu\u011funun anla\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 durumunda yaln\u0131z o celse i\u00e7in muhakemeye devam edilece\u011fi, takip eden celseye kadar noksan de\u011fer \u00fczerinden pe\u015fin karar ve ilam harc\u0131 tamamlanmad\u0131k\u00e7a davaya devam edilmeyecektir.<\/strong><strong><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Ba\u015fvuru konusu dava gayrimenkul\u00fcn ayn\u0131na ili\u015fkin tapu iptali ve tescili davas\u0131d\u0131r. Davaya konu de\u011ferin belirlenmesi \u00f6denecek nispi harc\u0131n miktar\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan \u00f6nemli oldu\u011fu gibi davan\u0131n temyize tabi olup olmamas\u0131 bak\u0131m\u0131ndan da \u00f6nemlidir. Dava konusu de\u011ferin rahat\u00e7a belirlenebildi\u011fi durumlarda \u00f6denecek harc\u0131n miktar\u0131 ve temyiz s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131n\u0131n belirlenmesi zor olmamakla birlikte dava de\u011ferinin belirlenmesinin ilk bak\u0131\u015fta tespit edilemedi\u011fi durumlarda ayn\u0131 \u015feyi s\u00f6ylemek kolay de\u011fildir. Tapu iptali ve tescili davalar\u0131nda da dava konusu de\u011ferin belirlenmesinin zorlu\u011fu sebebiyle kanun koyucu taraf\u0131ndan d\u00fczenleme yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f, Yarg\u0131tay i\u00e7tihatlar\u0131nda da durum a\u00e7\u0131kl\u0131\u011fa kavu\u015fturulmu\u015ftur. An\u0131lan Yarg\u0131tay i\u00e7tihatlar\u0131nda, ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n ayn\u0131na y\u00f6nelik davalarda ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n dava tarihindeki ger\u00e7ek bedelinin belirlenmesinin ancak mahallinde yap\u0131lacak ke\u015fif sonucu al\u0131nacak bilirki\u015fi raporuyla m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olaca\u011f\u0131 belirtilmi\u015ftir. Bu durumda belirlenen ger\u00e7ek de\u011fer \u00fczerinden harc\u0131n tamamlanmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi, aksi h\u00e2lde yarg\u0131lamaya devam edilemeyece\u011finin yasal d\u00fczenleme oldu\u011fu hat\u0131rlat\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Belirlenen ger\u00e7ek de\u011fer \u00fczerinden harc\u0131n tamamlat\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n mahkeme taraf\u0131ndan resen yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi de vurgulanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Somut olayda ba\u015fvurucu murisi taraf\u0131ndan tapu kayd\u0131na esas de\u011fer \u00fczerinden dava a\u00e7\u0131lm\u0131\u015f, yarg\u0131laman\u0131n devam\u0131 s\u0131ras\u0131nda al\u0131nan bilirki\u015fi raporunda dava konusu gayrimenkul\u00fcn de\u011ferinin 100.000 TL oldu\u011fu belirtilmi\u015ftir. B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi istinaf karar\u0131nda dava konusu ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n ger\u00e7ek de\u011feri ile sat\u0131\u015f de\u011feri aras\u0131ndaki orans\u0131zl\u0131\u011f\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131k oldu\u011funu fakat subjektif unsur olan darda kalma, tecr\u00fcbesizlik, d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcncesizlik h\u00e2llerinin S.\u00d6.de bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, daval\u0131n\u0131n ise yararlanmak ve s\u00f6m\u00fcrmek kast\u0131n\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131mad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ifade etmi\u015ftir. Yani istinaf incelemesi sonucunda dava konusu ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n de\u011ferinin ger\u00e7ek de\u011ferinin \u00e7ok alt\u0131nda oldu\u011funun kabul edildi\u011fi fakat subjektif unsurun ispat edilememesi sebebiyle davan\u0131n reddedildi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Buna g\u00f6re gerek bilirki\u015fi raporu ve daval\u0131 taraf\u0131n beyan\u0131ndan gerekse de B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi karar\u0131ndan dava konusu gayrimenkul\u00fcn ger\u00e7ek de\u011ferinin temyiz s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131 olan 40.000 TL&#8217;nin \u00fczerinde oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r.&nbsp;<strong>Ba\u015fvurucunun as\u0131l iddias\u0131n\u0131n davan\u0131n esas\u0131n\u0131n sat\u0131\u015fa konu ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n ger\u00e7ek de\u011ferinin tapu kayd\u0131nda g\u00f6sterilenden \u00e7ok daha fazla oldu\u011fu de\u011ferlendirildi\u011finde Dairenin dava dilek\u00e7esinde belirtilen 28.000 TL&#8217;yi esas almak suretiyle dava de\u011ferinin temyiz s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131 alt\u0131nda kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle temyiz ba\u015fvurusunu reddetmesinin kanuni dayana\u011f\u0131n\u0131n bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 sonucuna ula\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Anayasa Mahkemesi, yukar\u0131da a\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 36. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan&nbsp;<strong><em>adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131ndaki mahkemeye eri\u015fim hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine<\/em><\/strong>&nbsp;karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Anayasa Mahkemesi, B\u00fclent \u00d6zer Ba\u015fvurusunda (Ba\u015fvuru No: 2018\/36896) temyiz isteminin dava de\u011ferinin temyiz s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131 alt\u0131nda kalmas\u0131 sebebiyle incelenmeksizin reddedilmesi nedeniyle mahkemeye eri\u015fim hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine karar verdi. Ba\u015fvurucu; dava konusu ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n de\u011ferinin 28.000 TL de\u011fil 100.000 TL oldu\u011funu, B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesinin davan\u0131n bu niteli\u011fi sebebiyle temyiz yolu a\u00e7\u0131k olmak \u00fczere karar verdi\u011fini fakat temyiz talebinin [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":3744,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[8],"tags":[40,28,13,21],"ppma_author":[96],"class_list":["post-3380","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-news","tag-anayasa-mahkemesi","tag-gunay-erdogan-avukatlik-burosu","tag-hukuki-analiz","tag-law"],"authors":[{"term_id":96,"user_id":1,"is_guest":0,"slug":"admin","display_name":"G\u00fcnay Erdo\u011fan Attorneys-at-Law","avatar_url":{"url":"https:\/\/gunayerdogan.com.tr\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/Gunay-Erdogan-logo_300px.webp","url2x":"https:\/\/gunayerdogan.com.tr\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/Gunay-Erdogan-logo_300px.webp"},"0":null,"1":"","2":"","3":"","4":"","5":"","6":"","7":"","8":""}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/gunayerdogan.com.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3380","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/gunayerdogan.com.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/gunayerdogan.com.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gunayerdogan.com.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gunayerdogan.com.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3380"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/gunayerdogan.com.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3380\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gunayerdogan.com.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/3744"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/gunayerdogan.com.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3380"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gunayerdogan.com.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3380"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gunayerdogan.com.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3380"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gunayerdogan.com.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/ppma_author?post=3380"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}