{"id":3378,"date":"2021-06-09T12:10:05","date_gmt":"2021-06-09T09:10:05","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.gunayerdogan.com.tr\/?p=3378"},"modified":"2023-10-14T17:51:20","modified_gmt":"2023-10-14T14:51:20","slug":"muvazaa-nedeniyle-tasarrufun-iptali-davalarina-iliskin-meydana-gelen-ictihat-degisikligi","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/gunayerdogan.com.tr\/en\/muvazaa-nedeniyle-tasarrufun-iptali-davalarina-iliskin-meydana-gelen-ictihat-degisikligi\/","title":{"rendered":"Muvazaa Nedeniyle Tasarrufun \u0130ptali Davalar\u0131na \u0130li\u015fkin Meydana Gelen \u0130\u00e7tihat De\u011fi\u015fikli\u011fi"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

TASARRUFUN \u0130PTAL\u0130 DAVALARINDA, \u0130PTALE TAB\u0130 TASARRUFUN GER\u00c7EKLE\u015eT\u0130R\u0130LD\u0130\u011e\u0130 TAR\u0130H\u0130N, ALACA\u011eIN DO\u011eUM TAR\u0130H\u0130NDEN SONRA OLMASI GEREK\u0130R M\u0130?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u0130cra veya iflas takibinden \u00f6nce veya takip s\u0131ras\u0131nda bor\u00e7lumum alacakl\u0131n\u0131n haklar\u0131n\u0131 ihlal edecek \u015fekilde yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 tasarruf i\u015flemlerinin iptali i\u00e7in ba\u015fvurulan yola tasarrufun iptali davas\u0131<\/em> denir. \u0130cra ve \u0130flas Kanunu\u2019nda, bu \u015fekilde yap\u0131lan i\u015flemlerin iptale tabi oldu\u011funu ifade etmek \u00fczere, \u201ctasarruflar\u0131n butlan\u0131na\u201d<\/em>  (m.277) \u201cbat\u0131ld\u0131r<\/em>\u201d (m.278-279) ve \u2018\u2019iptal edilebilir\u2019\u2019 <\/em>(m.280) ifadelerine yer verilmi\u015ftir. Bu ifadelerin tamam\u0131, maddi hukuk alan\u0131ndaki kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 de\u011fil, icra ve iflas hukuku alan\u0131ndaki kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 temsil etmek \u00fczere ayn\u0131 anlamda kullan\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. Zira burada ger\u00e7ek anlamda tasarruflar iptal edilmemekte, yaln\u0131zca alacakl\u0131ya \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc ki\u015fiye ait malvarl\u0131\u011f\u0131 de\u011ferinin paraya \u00e7evrilmesini isteme yetkisi verilmektedir. Alacakl\u0131n\u0131n alaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 elde etmesi \u00fczerine bakiye k\u0131s\u0131m, yine \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc ki\u015fiye verilmektedir. Buradaki \u201ciptal” ifadesi yan\u0131lt\u0131c\u0131d\u0131r. Zira a\u015fa\u011f\u0131da incelendi\u011fi \u00fczere bu dava neticesinde alacakl\u0131ya yaln\u0131zca \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc ki\u015fiye ait malvarl\u0131\u011f\u0131 de\u011ferinin paraya \u00e7evrilmesini isteme yetkisi verilmektedir. Alacakl\u0131n\u0131n alaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 elde etmesi \u00fczerine bakiye k\u0131s\u0131m yine \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc ki\u015fiye b\u0131rak\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. Tasarrufun iptali davalar\u0131n\u0131n amac\u0131, bor\u00e7lunun hacizden\/ifl\u00e2stan \u00f6nce yapm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu “ge\u00e7erli” tasarruf i\u015flemleri ile malvarl\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan \u00e7\u0131kard\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u015feyler \u00fczerinden, bor\u00e7lununmu\u015f gibi alacakl\u0131y\u0131 tatmin etmektir. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bu nedenle, tasarrufun iptali davas\u0131 muvazaaya dayal\u0131 davalardan da farkl\u0131d\u0131r. Meden\u00ee hukuk alan\u0131ndaki muvazaa davalar\u0131ndan farkl\u0131 olarak, tasarrufun iptali davalar\u0131 mutlak de\u011fil, nisp\u00eedir. Ba\u015fka bir deyi\u015fle bu dava, mal\u0131n ayn\u0131na ili\u015fkin sonu\u00e7lar do\u011furmayan \u015fahs\u00ee bir davad\u0131r. \u0130ptal davas\u0131na konu olan tasarruflar \u00f6z\u00fcnde ge\u00e7erli olan i\u015flemlerdir. Alacakl\u0131n\u0131n bu davay\u0131 a\u00e7maktaki amac\u0131, tasarrufu salt icra takibi bak\u0131m\u0131ndan iptal ettirerek alaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 tahsil etmektir. Buna kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131k muvazaa s\u00f6z konusu oldu\u011funda davac\u0131 b\u00fct\u00fcn h\u00fck\u00fcm ve sonu\u00e7lar\u0131 ile bu i\u015flemin kesin olarak ge\u00e7ersiz oldu\u011funu tespit ettirmeyi ama\u00e7lar. Bu nedenle muvazaa davas\u0131 i\u00e7in bir icra takibi yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131na veya davac\u0131n\u0131n elinde bor\u00e7 \u00f6demeden aciz belgesi bulunmas\u0131na gerek yoktur. Ayr\u0131ca a\u015fa\u011f\u0131da incelenece\u011fi \u00fczere, tasarrufun iptali davas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131labilmesi, bu davan\u0131n \u015fahs\u00ee bir dava da olmas\u0131 sebebiyle, hak d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fc s\u00fcrelere t\u00e2bi k\u0131l\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Buna kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131k m\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131na dayanan muvazaa davas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan herhangi bir s\u00fcre s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131 bulunmamaktad\u0131r. Tasarrufun iptali davas\u0131n\u0131n \u015fahs\u00ee dava olmas\u0131na ba\u011flanan sonu\u00e7, davan\u0131n kazan\u0131lmas\u0131 h\u00e2linde iptale t\u00e2bi i\u015flemin tamamen de\u011fil, alacakl\u0131n\u0131n haklar\u0131na zarar verdi\u011fi oranda iptal edilmesidir. Bu \u00e7er\u00e7evede davac\u0131 alacakl\u0131n\u0131n iptal davas\u0131n\u0131 kazanmas\u0131 h\u00e2linde, dava konusu mal sanki bor\u00e7lunun malvarl\u0131\u011f\u0131ndaym\u0131\u015f gibi satt\u0131r\u0131l\u0131r ve elde edilen bedelden alacakl\u0131 alaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 al\u0131r. Alacakl\u0131n\u0131n bu davay\u0131 kazanmas\u0131 ile o mal\u0131n m\u00fclkiyeti bor\u00e7luya geri d\u00f6nmez. Bu nedenle mal\u0131n sat\u0131\u015f\u0131ndan arta kalan bedel (\u015fayet kalm\u0131\u015fsa) bor\u00e7luya de\u011fil \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc ki\u015fiye verilir. Burada meden\u00ee hukuk ba\u011flam\u0131nda bir butlan ya da iptal edilebilirlik olsa idi, alacakl\u0131n\u0131n davay\u0131 kazanmas\u0131 h\u00e2linde mal\u0131n m\u00fclkiyeti bor\u00e7luya geri d\u00f6necek ve alacakl\u0131 alaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ald\u0131ktan sonra artan bedel (\u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc ki\u015fiye de\u011fil) bor\u00e7luya verilecekti.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Uygulamada muvazaaya dayal\u0131 olarak tasarrufun iptali davas\u0131 ad\u0131 alt\u0131nda davalar a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, Yarg\u0131tay\u2019\u0131n da bu davalara \u00f6zg\u00fc \u00e7e\u015fitli i\u00e7tihatlar\u0131 bulundu\u011fu g\u00f6r\u00fclmektedir. Yukar\u0131da da belirtildi\u011fi \u00fczere, esasen bu iki talep birbiri ile \u00e7eli\u015fir (konusu, amac\u0131, sonu\u00e7lar\u0131 itibariyle farkl\u0131d\u0131r). \u00dcstelik tasarrufun iptali davalar\u0131n\u0131n basit yarg\u0131lama us\u00fbl\u00fcne t\u00e2bi tutulmas\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda muvazaaya dayal\u0131 davalar yaz\u0131l\u0131 yarg\u0131lama us\u00fbl\u00fcne t\u00e2bi olaca\u011f\u0131ndan, bu \u015fekilde a\u00e7\u0131lan bir davada, h\u00e2kimin Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu\u2019nun 31\u2019inci maddesi \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde ayd\u0131nlatma y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn gere\u011fi olarak davac\u0131n\u0131n talebine ili\u015fkin belirsizli\u011fi gidermesi gerekir. Alacakl\u0131n\u0131n muvazaaya ili\u015fkin iddias\u0131n\u0131n, takip i\u00e7erisinde istihkak prosed\u00fcr\u00fc \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde de \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fclmesi m\u00fcmk\u00fcnd\u00fcr\/beklenir. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Buna kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131k, muvazaa ve tasarrufun iptali taleplerinin terditli olarak ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclebilmesi m\u00fcmk\u00fcnd\u00fcr. Bor\u00e7lunun mal ka\u00e7\u0131rmak amac\u0131yla yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 tasarruflardan zarar g\u00f6ren alacakl\u0131, a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131 davada \u00f6nce “i\u015flemin muvazaal\u0131 oldu\u011funun tespiti ile buna g\u00f6re h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmas\u0131n\u0131” (yani; bor\u00e7lunun yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u015flemin h\u00fck\u00fcms\u00fczl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn tespitini), bu (muvazaa) iddias\u0131n\u0131n kabul edilmemesi h\u00e2linde ise “\u0130cra ve \u0130fl\u00e2s Kanunu\u2019nun 277 ve devam\u0131 maddelerine g\u00f6re tasarrufun iptaline karar verilmesini” talep edebilir. Keza \u00f6nce \u201c\u0130cra ve \u0130fl\u00e2s Kanunu\u2019nun 277 ve devam\u0131 maddelerine g\u00f6re tasarrufun iptalini” bu kabul edilmedi\u011fi taktirde \u201cmuvazaa nedeniyle h\u00fck\u00fcms\u00fczl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn tespitine karar verilmesini” isteyebilir. Davac\u0131 birinci h\u00e2lde ispat y\u00fck\u00fcn\u00fcn gere\u011fini yerine getirmeme ihtim\u00e2lini dikkate alarak, ikinci h\u00e2lde ise \u201ciptal sebeplerine ili\u015fkin objektif ko\u015fullar\u0131n ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmeme ihtim\u00e2li nedeniyle” terditli (kademeli) talepte bulunur. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Davac\u0131 ayn\u0131 vak\u0131a a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan hem muvazaa sebebiyle ge\u00e7ersizli\u011fin tespiti hem de \u0130cra ve \u0130fl\u00e2s Kanunu\u2019nun 277 ve devam\u0131 maddeleri kapsam\u0131nda kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u00e7in iptal davas\u0131 a\u00e7abilir. Bu iki dava aras\u0131nda derdestlik g\u00fcndeme gelmez. Zira her iki davada mahkemeye y\u00f6neltilen us\u00fbl\u00ee talep farkl\u0131d\u0131r. Muvazaaya dayal\u0131 davada i\u015flemin ge\u00e7ersizli\u011finin tespiti istenirken, iptal davas\u0131nda alacaklar\u0131n\u0131 ihl\u00e2l etti\u011fi nispette \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc ki\u015fiye ait bir malvarl\u0131\u011f\u0131 de\u011ferinin paraya \u00e7evrilmesi yetkisi talep edilmektedir. Bu iki dava aras\u0131nda kesin h\u00fck\u00fcm etkisi de s\u00f6z konusu olmaz. Ancak muvazaaya dayal\u0131 davan\u0131n daha \u00f6nce kesinle\u015fmesi h\u00e2linde, iptal davas\u0131 konusuz kal\u0131r. Zira art\u0131k malvarl\u0131\u011f\u0131 de\u011ferinin bor\u00e7luya ait oldu\u011fu kesinle\u015fmi\u015ftir. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla s\u00f6z konusu malvarl\u0131\u011f\u0131 de\u011ferinin alacakl\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan haczedilmesi m\u00fcmk\u00fcn h\u00e2le gelmi\u015ftir. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Yarg\u0131tay\u2019\u0131n bug\u00fcne kadar tespit edebildi\u011fimiz \u00e7e\u015fitli i\u00e7tihatlar\u0131nda, bor\u00e7lunun iptale t\u00e2bi tasarrufunun alacakl\u0131n\u0131n alaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n do\u011fmas\u0131ndan sonra yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fini ve bu hususun da dava \u00f6n ko\u015fulu oldu\u011funu kabul etti\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fclmekte idi. Yarg\u0131tay\u2019\u0131n bu kabul\u00fcnde, alacakl\u0131n\u0131n bor\u00e7lunun mevcut durumunu bilerek ona kredi a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131 veya bor\u00e7 verdi\u011fi, ba\u015fka bir deyi\u015fle, bor\u00e7lunun malvarl\u0131\u011f\u0131na g\u00f6re hareket etti\u011fi; bor\u00e7lanma s\u0131ras\u0131nda bor\u00e7lunun malvarl\u0131\u011f\u0131nda bulunmayan bir mal hakk\u0131nda alacakl\u0131n\u0131n dava a\u00e7amayaca\u011f\u0131 d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcncesi yatmaktad\u0131r. Bu nedenle Yarg\u0131tay, bor\u00e7lunun iptale tabi tasarrufunun alacakl\u0131n\u0131n alaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n do\u011fmas\u0131ndan sonra yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fini \u015fart olarak g\u00f6rmekte idi. Nitekim Yarg\u0131tay 17. Hukuk Dairesi<\/strong>\u2019nin 2018\/6311 E., 2019\/1570 K. ve 18.2.2019<\/strong> tarihli karar\u0131nda, ister \u0130\u0130K m.277 vd. maddelerine dayal\u0131 olarak a\u00e7\u0131ls\u0131n ister BK m. 18 gere\u011fince a\u00e7\u0131lm\u0131\u015f muvazaa nedenine dayal\u0131 olsun her iki dava t\u00fcr\u00fcnde de iptali istenilen tasarrufun borcun do\u011fumundan sonra ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmi\u015f olmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fine karar verilmi\u015ftir. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Yarg\u0131tay 17. Hukuk Dairesi ile 4. Hukuk Dairesi\u2019nin birle\u015fmesi sonras\u0131nda ise Yarg\u0131tay 4. Hukuk Dairesi i\u00e7tihat de\u011fi\u015ftirmi\u015f, muvazaaya dayal\u0131 tasarrufun iptalinde borcun do\u011fum tarihinin \u00f6nemi olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na <\/strong>ili\u015fkin karar vermi\u015ftir. Yarg\u0131tay 4. Hukuk Dairesi\u2019nin 2020\/1254 E., 2021\/1330 K.<\/strong> ve 22.03.2021 tarihli karar\u0131nda ilk derece mahkemesi taraf\u0131ndan verilen \u201cdavaya konu tasarrufun borcun do\u011fum tarihi olan eylemin ger\u00e7ekle\u015fti\u011fi tarihten \u00f6nce olmas\u0131 nedeniyle iptalinin m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle, davan\u0131n \u00f6n ko\u015ful yoklu\u011fundan reddine\u201d karar\u0131 bozulmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

 Yarg\u0131tay 4. Hukuk Dairesi konuyla ilgili \u015fu de\u011ferlendirmeleri yapm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u2018\u2019Kural olarak \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc ki\u015filer, dan\u0131\u015f\u0131kl\u0131 i\u015flem nedeniyle haklar\u0131 zarara u\u011frat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 takdirde tek tarafl\u0131 veya \u00e7ok tarafl\u0131 olan bu hukuki i\u015flemlerin ge\u00e7ersizli\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrebilirler. \u00dc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc ki\u015finin dan\u0131\u015f\u0131kl\u0131 i\u015flem ile hakk\u0131n\u0131n zarar g\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn benimsenebilmesi i\u00e7in onun dan\u0131\u015f\u0131kl\u0131 i\u015flemde bulunandan bir alaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n var olmas\u0131 ve bu alaca\u011f\u0131n \u00f6denmesinin \u00f6nlemek amac\u0131yla dan\u0131\u015f\u0131kl\u0131 bir i\u015flem yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekir. Muvazaal\u0131 i\u015flemler ile kendisinin zararland\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ileri s\u00fcren davac\u0131n\u0131n bu davadaki amac\u0131 alaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 tahsil edebilmek i\u00e7in muvazaa nedeniyle temelde ge\u00e7ersiz olan i\u015flemin h\u00fck\u00fcms\u00fczl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc sa\u011flamakt\u0131r<\/u><\/strong>. \u00c7\u00fcnk\u00fc, dan\u0131\u015f\u0131kl\u0131 bir hukuki i\u015flem ile \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc ki\u015filere zarara verilmesi onlara kar\u015f\u0131 i\u015flenmi\u015f bir haks\u0131z eylem niteli\u011findedir. Ancak \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc ki\u015filerin dan\u0131\u015f\u0131kl\u0131 i\u015flem ile haklar\u0131n\u0131n zarara u\u011frat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n benimsenebilmesi i\u00e7in, onlar\u0131n, dan\u0131\u015f\u0131kl\u0131 i\u015flemde bulunandan alacaklar\u0131 bulunmal\u0131 ve dan\u0131\u015f\u0131kl\u0131 i\u015flem o alaca\u011f\u0131n \u00f6denmesini \u00f6nlemek amac\u0131yla yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f bulunmal\u0131d\u0131r. Muvazaa iddias\u0131na dayal\u0131 tasarrufun iptali davalar\u0131 her zaman a\u00e7\u0131labilecek olup, muvazaa iddialar\u0131nda hak d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fc s\u00fcre ya da zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 s\u00fcresi s\u00f6z konusu olmaz<\/u><\/strong>. Bu, h\u00fck\u00fcms\u00fczl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn do\u011fal bir sonucudur. Tasarrufun iptali davas\u0131nda tasarrufun, borcun do\u011fum tarihinden sonra yap\u0131lmas\u0131 dava a\u00e7\u0131labilmesinin sebeplerinden biriyken, muvazaa davalar\u0131nda i\u015flemin ne zaman yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n bir \u00f6nemi yoktur. Nitekim, kesin h\u00fck\u00fcms\u00fcz say\u0131lan bir i\u015flemin ne zaman yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n bir \u00f6nemi de bulunmamaktad\u0131r. Zira i\u015flem, yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 andan itibaren ge\u00e7ersiz say\u0131l\u0131r. Davaya konu edilen muvazaal\u0131 i\u015flem, borcun do\u011fumundan \u00f6nce veya sonra yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olsa da butlan yapt\u0131r\u0131m\u0131na tabidir. Temlik eden ki\u015finin yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 bir ba\u011f\u0131\u015f ya da ivazs\u0131z tasarruf ancak ger\u00e7ek iradeye uygun de\u011filse iptal edilebilir.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u2026<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u015eu halde mahkemece, muvazaan\u0131n varl\u0131\u011f\u0131 kabul edilmek suretiyle davan\u0131n kabul\u00fcne karar verilmesi gerekirken, a\u00e7\u0131klanan y\u00f6nler g\u00f6zetilmeyerek, yerinde olmayan gerek\u00e7e ile istemin \u00f6n ko\u015ful yoklu\u011fundan reddedilmi\u015f olmas\u0131 usul ve yasaya uygun d\u00fc\u015fmedi\u011finden, karar\u0131n bozulmas\u0131 gerekmi\u015ftir.\u2019\u2019<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Yarg\u0131tay 4. Hukuk Dairesi\u2019nin yeni i\u00e7tihad\u0131nda muvazaaya dayal\u0131 taleplerin i\u015flemin h\u00fck\u00fcms\u00fczl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc sonucunu do\u011furaca\u011f\u0131, bu nedenle herhangi bir s\u00fcreye tabi olmayaca\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7elerinin isabetli oldu\u011fu de\u011ferlendirilmelidir. Ancak Y\u00fcksek Mahkemenin, i\u015faret etti\u011fi h\u00fck\u00fcms\u00fczl\u00fck sonucuna ra\u011fmen, davay\u0131 nitelendirirken yine \u201cmuvazaaya dayal\u0131 tasarrufun iptali davas\u0131\u201d ifadesi kullanmas\u0131 kanaatimizce hatal\u0131d\u0131r. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Tasarrufun iptali davalar\u0131 ve muvazaaya ili\u015fkin ayr\u0131nt\u0131l\u0131 bilgi i\u00e7in bize (info@gunayerdogan.com.tr) ba\u015fvurabilirsiniz. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

TASARRUFUN \u0130PTAL\u0130 DAVALARINDA, \u0130PTALE TAB\u0130 TASARRUFUN GER\u00c7EKLE\u015eT\u0130R\u0130LD\u0130\u011e\u0130 TAR\u0130H\u0130N, ALACA\u011eIN DO\u011eUM TAR\u0130H\u0130NDEN SONRA OLMASI GEREK\u0130R M\u0130? \u0130cra veya iflas takibinden \u00f6nce veya takip s\u0131ras\u0131nda bor\u00e7lumum alacakl\u0131n\u0131n haklar\u0131n\u0131 ihlal edecek \u015fekilde yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 tasarruf i\u015flemlerinin iptali i\u00e7in ba\u015fvurulan yola tasarrufun iptali davas\u0131 denir. \u0130cra ve \u0130flas Kanunu\u2019nda, bu \u015fekilde yap\u0131lan i\u015flemlerin iptale tabi oldu\u011funu ifade etmek \u00fczere, \u201ctasarruflar\u0131n butlan\u0131na\u201d  (m.277) \u201cbat\u0131ld\u0131r\u201d (m.278-279) […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":3725,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[29,8],"tags":[],"ppma_author":[96],"class_list":["post-3378","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-iflas-konkordato-ve-yeniden-yapilandirma","category-news"],"authors":[{"term_id":96,"user_id":1,"is_guest":0,"slug":"admin","display_name":"G\u00fcnay Erdo\u011fan Attorneys-at-Law","avatar_url":{"url":"https:\/\/gunayerdogan.com.tr\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/Gunay-Erdogan-logo_300px.webp","url2x":"https:\/\/gunayerdogan.com.tr\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/Gunay-Erdogan-logo_300px.webp"},"1":"","2":"","3":"","4":"","5":"","6":"","7":"","8":""}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/gunayerdogan.com.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3378","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/gunayerdogan.com.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/gunayerdogan.com.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gunayerdogan.com.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gunayerdogan.com.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3378"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/gunayerdogan.com.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3378\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gunayerdogan.com.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/3725"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/gunayerdogan.com.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3378"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gunayerdogan.com.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3378"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gunayerdogan.com.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3378"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gunayerdogan.com.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/ppma_author?post=3378"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}