{"id":3333,"date":"2021-04-13T12:10:24","date_gmt":"2021-04-13T09:10:24","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.gunayerdogan.com.tr\/?p=3333"},"modified":"2023-10-14T17:58:48","modified_gmt":"2023-10-14T14:58:48","slug":"yargitay-9-ve-22-hd-birlesme-sonrasi-yeni-ilke-kararlari","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/gunayerdogan.com.tr\/en\/yargitay-9-ve-22-hd-birlesme-sonrasi-yeni-ilke-kararlari\/","title":{"rendered":"Yarg\u0131tay 9. ve 22. HD Birle\u015fme Sonras\u0131 Yeni \u0130lke Kararlar\u0131"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

A- 15.10.2020 TAR\u0130H\u0130NDE G\u00d6R\u00dc\u015e\u00dcLEN KONULAR<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

1. As\u0131l i\u015fveren-alt i\u015fveren ili\u015fkisinde tespit edilen muvazaa ya da ge\u00e7ersizli\u011fin yeni ihale d\u00f6nemi i\u00e7in de ge\u00e7erli olup olamayaca\u011f\u0131:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Her d\u00f6nem i\u00e7in ge\u00e7ersizlik veya muvazaa olgusu; her bir s\u00f6zle\u015fme, \u015fartname h\u00fck\u00fcmleri ile dosya kapsam\u0131na g\u00f6re de\u011ferlendirilir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

2. Temyiz ba\u015fvurusunda temyiz harc\u0131 yerine istinaf harc\u0131n\u0131n al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n anla\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 halinde har\u00e7 tamamlatma gerekip gerekmedi\u011fi:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Temyiz talebi yerine istinaf talebinde bulunulmu\u015f olmas\u0131 kanun yoluna ba\u015fvuru \u015fart\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flar. Ancak harc\u0131n temyiz harc\u0131 yerine daha az olan istinaf harc\u0131 olarak yat\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 halinde, HMK’n\u0131n 366. maddesi yollamas\u0131yla ayn\u0131 Kanun’un 344. maddesine g\u00f6re i\u015flem yap\u0131lmak \u00fczere har\u00e7 tamamlatma (DET) i\u015flemi uygulan\u0131r.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

M\u00fc\u015fterek m\u00fcteselsil sorumlu birden fazla daval\u0131 oldu\u011funda, daval\u0131lardan her birinin ba\u015fvurma harc\u0131 ve nispi temyiz har\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131 yat\u0131r\u0131p yat\u0131rmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 kontrol edilir. Eksiklik halinde (har\u00e7 tamamlama i\u00e7in m\u00fczekkere) DET i\u015flemi uygulan\u0131r.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

3. Diyanet Vakf\u0131 Hastanesinin kamuya devri ile ilgili Kanun uyar\u0131nca devlet memurlu\u011funa ge\u00e7irilenlerin kulland\u0131r\u0131lmayan y\u0131ll\u0131k \u00fccretli izin haklar\u0131na ili\u015fkin yasal d\u00fczenlemenin ve bu konuda Yarg\u0131tay 22. Hukuk Dairesinin Anayasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k iddias\u0131yla Anayasa Mahkemesine yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 ba\u015fvurunun reddedilmesi:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Anayasa Mahkemesi karar\u0131 gere\u011fi “y\u0131ll\u0131k izin \u00fccreti talep edilemez” \u015feklinde oy\u00e7oklu\u011fuyla g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f ortaya konuldu.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

4. Yarg\u0131lama sonucu tespit edilen \u00fccretin bordoda tahakkuku bulunan fazla \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmaya etkisi (d\u00fc\u015f\u00fck \u00fccretten tahakkuk)<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u0130mzal\u0131 bordrolarda fazla \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma, hafta tatili \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmas\u0131 veya ulusal bayram ve genel tatil \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmas\u0131 tahakkuklar\u0131 varsa ve bordro \u00fccretinin ger\u00e7e\u011fi yans\u0131tmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 yarg\u0131lama ile belirlendi\u011finde, d\u00f6nem d\u0131\u015flamas\u0131 yerine mahsup i\u015flemi uygulan\u0131r. Hesaplama imzal\u0131 bordrodan anla\u015f\u0131lan \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma saatleri veya g\u00fcn say\u0131s\u0131na g\u00f6re ve ger\u00e7ek \u00fccretten yap\u0131l\u0131r, bordroda yer alan \u00f6deme tutarlar\u0131 mahsup edilir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u0130\u015f\u00e7inin temel \u00fccretinin b\u00f6l\u00fcnerek fazla \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma, hafta tatili \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmas\u0131 veya ulusal bayram ve genel tatil \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmalar\u0131n\u0131 da kapsar \u015fekilde belirlendi\u011fi hileli bordrolarda; yap\u0131lan \u00f6deme sadece temel \u00fccreti ilgilendirdi\u011finden, d\u00f6nem d\u0131\u015flamas\u0131 veya mahsup i\u015flemleri uygulanmaz.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

5. S\u00fcresinde cevap dilek\u00e7esi vermeyen daval\u0131n\u0131n \u0131slahla zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 definde bulunup bulunamayaca\u011f\u0131:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

 Cevap dilek\u00e7esi verilmemi\u015fse, olmayan bir i\u015flemin \u0131slah yoluyla d\u00fczeltilmesi m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olamayaca\u011f\u0131ndan, cevap dilek\u00e7esinin \u0131slah\u0131 yoluyla zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 definin ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclemeyece\u011fi oy\u00e7oklu\u011fuyla kabul edildi. Ancak cevap dilek\u00e7esi vermeyen i\u015fveren, \u0131slah yoluyla dava konusu miktarlar\u0131n artt\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 \u00fczerine usul\u00fcne uygun olarak artt\u0131r\u0131lan k\u0131s\u0131m i\u00e7in zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 defini ileri s\u00fcrebilir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

6. Dava dilek\u00e7esinde davan\u0131n belirsiz alacak davas\u0131 veya k\u0131smi dava oldu\u011funa y\u00f6nelik a\u00e7\u0131klama bulunmayan ve dava de\u011feri 50-100-1000 TL gibi g\u00f6sterilen davalar\u0131n belirsiz alacak davas\u0131 olarak a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fki iddialar\u0131n dinlenip dinlenemeyece\u011fi:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Belirsiz alacak davas\u0131 alacakl\u0131ya zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 ve faiz ba\u015flang\u0131c\u0131 noktas\u0131nda imkanlar sa\u011flayan istisnai bir dava t\u00fcr\u00fc olup, dava dilek\u00e7esinde davan\u0131n belirsiz alacak davas\u0131 olarak a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a yaz\u0131l\u0131 olmas\u0131 veya HMK 107. maddesine dayan\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n belirtilmesi gerekir. Alaca\u011f\u0131n belirsiz oldu\u011funun dava dilek\u00e7esinde a\u00e7\u0131klanmas\u0131 bu noktada \u00f6nemsizdir. Zira alacak belirsiz ise alacakl\u0131n\u0131n k\u0131smi dava veya belirsiz alacak davas\u0131 a\u00e7ma hakk\u0131 vard\u0131r. Dava dilek\u00e7esinde “belirsiz alacak davas\u0131” a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 yaz\u0131l\u0131 de\u011filse veya HMK’n\u0131n 107. maddesine dayan\u0131lmam\u0131\u015fsa, dava konusu miktarlar\u0131n 50-100-1000 TL gibi g\u00f6sterilmesi halinde davan\u0131n k\u0131smi dava olarak a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 kabul edilmelidir. Sonradan alacakl\u0131 taraf\u0131n davay\u0131 belirsiz alacak davas\u0131 olarak nitelemesi sonuca etkili de\u011fildir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

7. Davadan feragat halinde, ilk derece mahkemesi taraf\u0131ndan bu konuda karar verilmek \u00fczere bozma karar\u0131 m\u0131 yoksa iade karar\u0131 m\u0131 verilece\u011fi:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

HMK’n\u0131n 310. maddesine 7251 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunla eklenen 3. f\u0131kraya g\u00f6re; davadan feragat veya kabul, dosyan\u0131n temyiz incelemesine g\u00f6nderilmesinden sonra yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015fsa, Yarg\u0131tay inceleme yapmaks\u0131z\u0131n dosyay\u0131 ek karar verilmek \u00fczere h\u00fckm\u00fc veren mahkemeye iade eder. Bozma karar\u0131 yerine ilgili madde kapsam\u0131nda iade karar\u0131 verilecektir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

8. \u0130stinaf s\u00fcresinde olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 halde s\u00fcreden red yerine esastan karar verildi\u011finde, B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi karar\u0131n\u0131n temyizinde bu husus resen g\u00f6zetilir mi?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u0130stinafa ba\u015fvuru s\u00fcresi ge\u00e7ti\u011fi halde b\u00f6lge adliye mahkemesi esasa dair bir karar vermi\u015fse ve bu karar temyiz edildi\u011finde; bu husus a\u00e7\u0131k temyiz konusu olmasa da HMK’n\u0131n 369, maddesine g\u00f6re resen inceleme yap\u0131l\u0131r.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

9. Objektif nedenler olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 halde belirli s\u00fcreli olarak yap\u0131lan s\u00f6zle\u015fmeye dayal\u0131 olarak i\u015f\u00e7inin bakiye s\u00fcre \u00fccreti talebinde i\u015fveren s\u00f6zle\u015fmenin belirsiz s\u00fcreli oldu\u011funu savunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131nda (hakk\u0131n k\u00f6t\u00fcye kullan\u0131m\u0131 yok) mahkeme resen objektif neden bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 g\u00f6zetebilir mi?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

S\u00f6zle\u015fmenin belirli s\u00fcreli oldu\u011funu i\u015fveren ileri s\u00fcremeyece\u011fi gibi, i\u015f\u00e7inin belirli s\u00fcreli s\u00f6zle\u015fmeye g\u00fcvenerek a\u00e7m\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu davada talepte bulunmas\u0131 halinde mahkeme resen objektif neden denetimi yapamaz.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

B- YARGITAY 9. HUKUK DA\u0130RES\u0130NDE 05.11.2020 TAR\u0130H\u0130NDE G\u00d6R\u00dc\u015e\u00dcLEN KONULAR<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

1. Usuls\u00fcz kredi kulland\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 iddialar\u0131na dayal\u0131 olarak bankan\u0131n i\u015f\u00e7i hakk\u0131nda a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131 tazminat davas\u0131nda borcun aciz vesikas\u0131na ba\u011flanmas\u0131n\u0131n aran\u0131p aranmayaca\u011f\u0131:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u0130\u015f\u00e7inin kredi verme i\u015fleminin, \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc ki\u015filerle ortak hareket etmek suretiyle menfaat teminine y\u00f6nelik olarak haks\u0131z fiil olarak icras\u0131 halinde aciz vesikas\u0131 aranmaks\u0131z\u0131n kredi bor\u00e7lular\u0131 ile birlikte m\u00fc\u015ftereken m\u00fcteselsilen sorumlu oldu\u011fu kabul edilir. Ancak i\u015f\u00e7inin do\u011frudan veya dolayl\u0131 menfaat temini olmaks\u0131z\u0131n, yeterli teminat almadan veya eksik ara\u015ft\u0131rma sonucu tahsis etti\u011fi krediler sebebiyle sorumlu tutulabilmesi i\u00e7in kredi bor\u00e7lular\u0131 hakk\u0131nda usul\u00fcne uygun takiplerin yap\u0131lmas\u0131 ve icra takibinin aciz vesikas\u0131na ba\u011flanmas\u0131 gerekir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

2. Ayn\u0131 i\u015fveren nezdinde aral\u0131kl\u0131 \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmalarda ilk d\u00f6nem hak kazan\u0131lan k\u0131dem tazminat\u0131n\u0131n k\u0131smen veya tamamen \u00f6denmesinde mahsup veya d\u00f6nem d\u0131\u015flamas\u0131:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Aral\u0131kl\u0131 \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmalarda ilk d\u00f6nem i\u00e7in tam olarak k\u0131dem tazminat\u0131 \u00f6demesi yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015fsa \u00f6nceki d\u00f6nemin tasfiye edildi\u011fi ve ayn\u0131 d\u00f6nem i\u00e7in iki kez k\u0131dem tazminat\u0131 \u00f6denemeyece\u011finden ikinci d\u00f6nem \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmas\u0131nda tasfiye edilen s\u00fcrenin dikkate al\u0131namayaca\u011f\u0131 kabul edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

 \u00d6nceki d\u00f6nem i\u00e7in fesih tarihindeki \u00fccret ve ekleriyle birlikte yap\u0131lan hesaba g\u00f6re k\u0131dem tazminat\u0131 hi\u00e7 \u00f6denmemi\u015f veya eksik \u00f6denmi\u015fse, \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma d\u00f6neminin tasfiyesinden s\u00f6z edilemez. \u0130\u015f\u00e7inin zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 defi s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde yeniden i\u015fe girerek ayn\u0131 i\u015fveren nezdinde i\u015fe ba\u015flamas\u0131 ve k\u0131dem tazminat\u0131na hak kazanacak \u015fekilde i\u015f ili\u015fkisinin sonlanmas\u0131 halinde, 1475 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun\u2019un 14\/2. maddesi h\u00fckm\u00fc gere\u011fi her iki d\u00f6nem birle\u015ftirilerek ve son d\u00f6nem \u00fccretiyle hesaplamaya gidilir. Daha \u00f6nce \u00f6denen k\u0131dem tazminat\u0131 yasal faiziyle birlikte mahsup edilir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

C-YARGITAY 9.HUKUK DAIRESINDE 04.01.2021 TAR\u0130H\u0130NDE G\u00d6R\u00dc\u015e\u00dcLEN KONULAR<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

1.Fazla \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma \u00fccrete dahil edildi\u011fi durumlarda y\u0131ll\u0131k 270 saatin uygulanma sorunu; her durumda salt y\u0131ll\u0131k 270 saat denetimi yeterli midir? \u00d6zellikle i\u015f\u00e7inin bir y\u0131ldan az \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 durumlarda ayl\u0131k 22,5 saati veya haftal\u0131k 5.2 saati a\u015fan \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmalar varsa fazlas\u0131 i\u00e7in hesaplama yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekmez mi?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Fazla \u00e7al\u0131\u015fman\u0131n kararla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lan \u00fccrete dahil oldu\u011fu y\u00f6n\u00fcnde ge\u00e7erli bir s\u00f6zle\u015fme h\u00fckm\u00fc oldu\u011funda, ilk olarak fazla \u00e7al\u0131\u015fman\u0131n y\u0131ll\u0131k 270 saati ge\u00e7ip ge\u00e7medi\u011fi denetimi yap\u0131l\u0131r. \u0130\u015f\u00e7i y\u0131l i\u00e7inde baz\u0131 d\u00f6nemlere fazla \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma yapmam\u0131\u015f olsa dahi, her ay \u00f6denen \u00fccret i\u00e7inde fazla \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma \u00fccreti yer ald\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan fazla \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma yap\u0131lan\/ yap\u0131lmayan d\u00f6nemler ayr\u0131m\u0131na gidilmeksizin y\u0131ll\u0131k 270 saati a\u015fan fazla \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131ktan sonra, y\u0131ll\u0131k bazda belirlenen fazla \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmalar 270 saatten az ise fazla \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma \u00fccreti hesaplanmaz. Y\u0131ll\u0131k 270 saatin a\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 halinde haftal\u0131k bazda 5,2 saati i\u00e7in hesaplamaya gidilir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

 \u0130\u015f\u00e7inin i\u015fyerindeki \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmas\u0131 bir y\u0131ldan az ise y\u0131ll\u0131k 270 saat kriteri \u00e7al\u0131\u015f\u0131lan ay say\u0131s\u0131na g\u00f6re azalt\u0131larak belirlenir. \u00d6rne\u011fin, Dairemiz, 2016\/ 24268 E say\u0131l\u0131 dosyas\u0131nda, i\u015f\u00e7inin \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma s\u00fcresi 10 ay 18 g\u00fcn, olup bu s\u00fcrede ispatlanan fazla \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma saat say\u0131s\u0131 184\u2019d\u00fcr. 270 saat x 10,6 ay\/ 12 ay= 238,5 g\u00fcn olup, davac\u0131 i\u015f\u00e7i \u00e7al\u0131\u015f\u0131lan s\u00fcreye g\u00f6re de temel \u00fccret i\u00e7inde \u00f6dendi\u011fi varsay\u0131lan fazla \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma s\u00fcresini a\u015fmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu nedenle fazla \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma \u00fccreti iste\u011fi reddedilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

2. Fazla \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma \u00fccrete dahildir kural\u0131, fazla s\u00fcrelerle \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmay\u0131 kapsar m\u0131? \u00d6rne\u011fin i\u015fyerinde haftal\u0131k 40 saat \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma varsa ve fiilen 50 saat \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015fsa, fazla \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma \u00fccrete dahildir denildi\u011finde, 45-50 aras\u0131 \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 olan fazla \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma \u00fccretinin \u00f6dendi\u011fi mi kabul edilmeli? Yoksa 40-45 aras\u0131 fazla s\u00fcrelerle \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131na m\u0131 say\u0131lmal\u0131? 40 saat \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma kararla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lan i\u015fyerinde 45 saat \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma yap\u0131l\u0131rsa ve s\u00f6zle\u015fmede yine fazla \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma \u00fccrete dahil denildi\u011finde, bu h\u00fck\u00fcm 5 saatlik fazla s\u00fcrelerle \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmay\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131lamaz m\u0131?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Fazla \u00e7al\u0131\u015fman\u0131n \u00fccrete dahil oldu\u011fu kural\u0131 fazla s\u00fcrelerle \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma \u00fccretini de kapsar. Bu durumda \u00f6ncelikle fazla s\u00fcrelerle \u00e7al\u0131\u015fman\u0131n temel \u00fccret i\u00e7inde \u00f6dendi\u011fi varsay\u0131l\u0131r. 5.2 saati a\u015fan fazla s\u00fcrelerle \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma veya fazla \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma varsa hesaplanarak \u00f6denir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

3. \u0130\u015f\u00e7i \u201c\u00f6zel nedenlerle” istifa etmi\u015f, k\u0131\u015fa s\u00fcrede a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131 davada \u00f6demeyen \u00fccretler fazla \u00e7 vs. dayal\u0131 olarak hakl\u0131 feshe dayan\u0131labilir mi?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u00d6zel nedenlerle istifa sonradan hakl\u0131 feshe d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr\u00fclemez. \u201cG\u00f6r\u00fclen l\u00fczum \u00fczerine” istifada ise dilek\u00e7enin genel bir i\u00e7erik ta\u015f\u0131d\u0131\u011f\u0131, sonradan k\u0131sa s\u00fcre i\u00e7inde hakl\u0131 fesih nedenine dayan\u0131labilece\u011fi kabul edildi.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

4. \u0130\u015f\u00e7i hakl\u0131 fesih nedenini de\u011fi\u015ftirebilir mi? \u00d6rne\u011fin prim \u00f6denmemesi sebebiyle i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin feshetti\u011fini bildirdi\u011finde, prim alaca\u011f\u0131 olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ancak fazla \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma \u00fccretinin varl\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirlendi\u011finde feshi hakl\u0131 olarak de\u011ferlendirilebilir mi?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u0130\u015f\u00e7inin hakl\u0131 feshinde fesih sebebiyle ba\u011fl\u0131 oldu\u011fu kabul edilmelidir. \u00d6rne\u011fin i\u015fverenin \u015feref ve namusa dokunan s\u00f6zler sarf etti\u011fine dayal\u0131 fesihte, fesih sebebi \u00f6denmeyen i\u015f\u00e7ilik alacaklar\u0131 olarak de\u011fi\u015ftirilemez. \u0130\u015f\u00e7inin \u00fccret alacaklar\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6denmedi\u011finden s\u00f6z edilerek hakl\u0131 fesih bildiriminde bulunmas\u0131 halinde, \u00fccret kavram\u0131 geni\u015f anlamda de\u011ferlendirilir ve temel \u00fccret d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda \u00fccretin eklerini ve fazla \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma hafta tatili ile genel tatil gibi alacaklar\u0131 kapsar. Fesih bildiriminde fazla \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma \u00fccretinin \u00f6denmemesine dayan\u0131lm\u0131\u015fsa, \u00f6denmeyen fazla \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma \u00fccreti veya hafta tatili \u00fccretinin tespiti halinde fesih hakl\u0131 olarak de\u011ferlendirilebilir. Ancak fazla \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma \u00fccretinin \u00f6denmedi\u011fine dayal\u0131 fesih, bayram ve genel tatil \u00fccretine kadar geni\u015fletilemez. Ba\u015fka bir ifadeyle fazla \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma \u00fccretine dayal\u0131 hakl\u0131 fesihte bayram ve genel tatil \u00fccretinin \u00f6denmedi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131l\u0131rsa fesih hakl\u0131 say\u0131lmaz. Prim\/ikramiye vb. \u00f6denmedi\u011fine dayal\u0131 hakl\u0131 fesihlerde, fesih bildiriminde ge\u00e7en nedenlerin d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda bir hakl\u0131 fesih nedeni kabul edilmez.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

5. K\u0131dem tazminat\u0131 yabanc\u0131 para \u00fczerinden kabul edilemez mi? (Tavan kontrol\u00fc yap\u0131ld\u0131ktan sonra)<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

 Fesih tarihindeki tavan kontrol\u00fc yap\u0131lmak kayd\u0131yla k\u0131dem tazminat\u0131 yabanc\u0131 para \u00fczerinden hesaplanarak h\u00fck\u00fcm alt\u0131na al\u0131nabilir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

6. Taksi \u015fof\u00f6r\u00fc i\u015f\u00e7i g\u00fcnl\u00fck has\u0131lat\u0131n sabit bir k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131 i\u015fverene veriyor ve kalan kazanc\u0131 i\u015f\u00e7inin \u00fccretini olu\u015fturuyorsa, i\u015f\u00e7i fazla \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma \u00fccretine hak kazanamaz m\u0131? Yoksa zams\u0131z k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131n \u00fccret \u00f6deme sistemine g\u00f6re kar\u015f\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 hesab\u0131n %50 zam k\u0131sm\u0131na g\u00f6re yap\u0131laca\u011f\u0131 sonucuna var\u0131labilir mi?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u0130\u015fverene g\u00fcnl\u00fck olarak sabit bir \u00fccret verilmesi \u015feklindeki \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma bi\u00e7iminde aradaki ili\u015fkinin has\u0131lat kiras\u0131na dayanabilece\u011fi \u00e7o\u011funlukla kabul g\u00f6rd\u00fc. \u0130\u015f ili\u015fkisi olarak kabul edildi\u011finde ise i\u015fverene sabit \u00fccret verildi\u011fi i\u015f\u00e7inin g\u00fcnl\u00fck has\u0131lattan kendi \u00fccretini ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 almas\u0131 sebebiyle \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma saatlerini kendisinin belirledi\u011fi ve fazla \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma \u00fccreti talep edemeyece\u011fi, oy \u00e7oklu\u011fuyla kabul edildi.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

7. \u0130mzal\u0131 makbuz veya belgelerde i\u015f\u00e7iye yap\u0131lan \u00f6demelerin miktar\u0131 yaz\u0131l\u0131 ise \u00f6demenin banka hesab\u0131na yap\u0131lmamas\u0131 sebebiyle belgelerin ge\u00e7erlili\u011finden s\u00f6z edilebilir mi?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

 T\u00fcrk Bor\u00e7lar Kanunu’nun 420. maddesinde \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen bankaya \u00f6deme zorunlulu\u011funun ibra belgeleri i\u00e7in gerekti\u011fi ancak ifaya dair makbuz, bordro vs. \u00f6demelerinde bankaya \u00f6deme \u015fart\u0131n\u0131n bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 kabul edildi. Miktar i\u00e7eren makbuz bordro kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n i\u015f\u00e7iye \u00f6dendi\u011fini g\u00f6steren belgeler ge\u00e7erli olun is\u00e7ilik alacaklar\u0131ndan mahsup edilir. \u0130\u015f\u00e7inin bu belgelere kar\u015f\u0131 irade fesad\u0131 iddias\u0131n\u0131 ileri s\u00fcrmesi m\u00fcmk\u00fcnd\u00fcr. Hata veya hile ile imzalat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, \u00f6denece\u011fi vaadiyle imzalad\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u015feklinde iddialar varsa tan\u0131k delili ve di\u011fer her t\u00fcrl\u00fc deliller ispat\u0131 gerekir. \u0130rade fesad\u0131 iddias\u0131 varsa t\u00fcm delillerle birlikte i\u015fverenin \u00f6demeyi defter ve kay\u0131tlar\u0131na yans\u0131t\u0131p yans\u0131tmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 da de\u011ferlendirilir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u0130braname \u015feklinde d\u00fczenlenen belgelerde miktar yaz\u0131l\u0131 olsa dahi Kanun gere\u011fi bankaya \u00f6deme olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 s\u00fcrece makbuz etkisinden s\u00f6z edilemez<\/p>\n\n\n\n

8. \u0130stinaf sonras\u0131 temyiz incelemesinde s\u0131n\u0131r:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

a. \u0130stinafa gelmeyen taraf B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesince verilen Ba\u015fvurunun Esastan Reddi karar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 temyiz etti\u011finde, usul\u00fc m\u00fcktesep hak olur mu?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Usul\u00fc m\u00fcktesep hak olur. \u0130stinaf kanun yoluna ba\u015fvurmayan taraf Ba\u015fvurunun Esastan Reddi karar\u0131 \u00fczerine temyiz edemez. B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi yeni bir karar verdi\u011finde, yeni karar\u0131n aleyhe hususlar\u0131n\u0131 istinafa ba\u015fvurmayan taraf temyiz edebilir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

b. \u0130stinafa cevapta, kar\u015f\u0131 taraf\u0131n istinaf ba\u015fvurusunun esastan reddini isteyen taraf temyiz etti\u011finde durum nedir?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u0130stinafa gelmeyen ve ayr\u0131ca di\u011fer taraf\u0131n istinaf\u0131n\u0131n reddini savunan taraf, Ba\u015fvurunun Esastan Reddi karar\u0131n\u0131 temyiz edemez.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

c. \u0130stinafa sadece s\u00fcre tutumla gelen veya gerek\u00e7eli istinaf\u0131 vermeyen taraf, istinaf\u0131n kamu d\u00fczeni ile yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 s\u0131n\u0131rl\u0131 inceleme sonucu Ba\u015fvurunun Esastan Reddi karar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 temyiz etti\u011finde inceleme kamu d\u00fczeni ve kanuna a\u00e7\u0131k ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131kla s\u0131n\u0131rl\u0131 m\u0131 yap\u0131lmal\u0131d\u0131r?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u0130stinafa getirilmeyen konular dahi temyize getirildi\u011finde de\u011ferlendirilebilir. HMK 369 gere\u011fi temyiz sebepleri ile ba\u011fl\u0131 olunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan kanuna a\u00e7\u0131k ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k halleri incelenebilir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

d. \u0130stinafa s\u00fcre tutum ile ba\u015fvurunun ard\u0131ndan gerek\u00e7eli istinaf dilek\u00e7esi s\u00fcresinden sonra verilmi\u015fse, istinaf incelemesi kamu d\u00fczeni ile s\u0131n\u0131rl\u0131 yap\u0131lamayaca\u011f\u0131ndan verilen karara kar\u015f\u0131 temyiz incelemesi kamu d\u00fczeni ve kanuna a\u00e7\u0131k ayk\u0131r\u0131kla s\u0131n\u0131rl\u0131 m\u0131 yap\u0131lmal\u0131d\u0131r?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u0130stinafa getirilmeyen konular dahi temyize getirildi\u011finde de\u011ferlendirilebilir. HMK 369 gere\u011fi temyiz sebepleri ile ba\u011fl\u0131 olunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan kanuna a\u00e7\u0131k ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k halleri incelenebilir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

e. Gerek\u00e7eli istinaf dilek\u00e7esi s\u00fcresinde verilmedi\u011fi gerek\u00e7esiyle sadece kamu d\u00fczeni ile s\u0131n\u0131rl\u0131 inceleme yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirten istinaf mahkemesi karar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 temyizde \u201cgerek\u00e7eli istinaf\u0131n s\u00fcresinde verildi\u011fi”<\/em> itiraz\u0131 geldi\u011finde ve ger\u00e7ekten gerek\u00e7eli istinaf ba\u015fvurusu s\u00fcresinde ise, bozma karar\u0131 verilerek, gerek\u00e7eli istinaf nedenlerinin de\u011ferlendirilmesi i\u00e7in B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesine g\u00f6nderilmeli mi, yoksa istinaf sebeplerini Yarg\u0131tay m\u0131 de\u011ferlendirmelidir?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bozma karar\u0131 verilerek s\u00fcresinde verilen gerek\u00e7eli istinaf sebeplerinin B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi taraf\u0131ndan incelenmesi sa\u011flan\u0131r.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

f. \u0130stinaftan sonra temyizde kesinlik s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131 bak\u0131m\u0131ndan, alacaklar reddedilmi\u015f, davac\u0131 temyiz etmi\u015f ve alacak miktar\u0131 hi\u00e7 hesaplanmam\u0131\u015fsa, kesinlik s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131 neye g\u00f6re belirlenir?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Davac\u0131 temyizi a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan kesinlik s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131n\u0131n tayini bak\u0131m\u0131ndan herhangi bir hesaplama yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, kural olarak temyiz hakk\u0131n\u0131n varl\u0131\u011f\u0131 kabul edilmelidir. Ancak davac\u0131n\u0131n iddia etti\u011fi \u00fccret ve \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma s\u00fcresine g\u00f6re dahi talep etti\u011fi i\u015f\u00e7ilik alacaklar\u0131n\u0131n temyiz kesinlik s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131 alt\u0131nda kalaca\u011f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a anla\u015f\u0131l\u0131yorsa, bu husus kararda belirtilerek kesinlikten redde dair karar verilir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

g. B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi karar\u0131n\u0131n Yarg\u0131tay taraf\u0131ndan bozulmas\u0131 ve dosyan\u0131n ilk derece mahkemesine g\u00f6nderilmesi \u00fczerine bozmaya uyularak verilen karara kar\u015f\u0131 kanun yolu sadece temyiz oldu\u011fundan, temyiz kesinlik s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131 m\u0131 yoksa istinaf kesinlik s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131 m\u0131 uygulan\u0131r?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bozma sonras\u0131 verilen karara kar\u015f\u0131 istinaf kanun yolu \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015f, do\u011frudan temyiz yolu kabul edilmi\u015ftir. \u0130lk derece karar\u0131n\u0131n kesinlik s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131 uygulanarak temyiz hakk\u0131n\u0131n varl\u0131\u011f\u0131 kabul edilmelidir. \u0130stinaftan gelen dosyalar i\u00e7in \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen kesinlik s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131 ilk derece mahkemesi i\u00e7in uygulanmaz. 2021 y\u0131l\u0131 itibar\u0131yla ilk derece kesinlik s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131 5880 TL ve istinaf kararlar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 temyiz s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131 78630 TL\u2019dir. Bu durumda bozma sonras\u0131nda ilk derecenin kararlar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 kabul veya reddedilen k\u0131s\u0131mlar\u0131n 2021 itibar\u0131yla 5880 TL\u2019yi a\u015fmas\u0131 halinde temyiz edilebilece\u011fi kabul edilmelidir.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

A- 15.10.2020 TAR\u0130H\u0130NDE G\u00d6R\u00dc\u015e\u00dcLEN KONULAR 1. As\u0131l i\u015fveren-alt i\u015fveren ili\u015fkisinde tespit edilen muvazaa ya da ge\u00e7ersizli\u011fin yeni ihale d\u00f6nemi i\u00e7in de ge\u00e7erli olup olamayaca\u011f\u0131: Her d\u00f6nem i\u00e7in ge\u00e7ersizlik veya muvazaa olgusu; her bir s\u00f6zle\u015fme, \u015fartname h\u00fck\u00fcmleri ile dosya kapsam\u0131na g\u00f6re de\u011ferlendirilir. 2. Temyiz ba\u015fvurusunda temyiz harc\u0131 yerine istinaf harc\u0131n\u0131n al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n anla\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 halinde har\u00e7 tamamlatma gerekip […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":3752,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[20,8],"tags":[32,33,34,35,22],"ppma_author":[96],"class_list":["post-3333","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-is-hukuku","category-news","tag-22-hukuk-dairesi","tag-9-hukuk-dairesi","tag-ilke-kararlari","tag-is-hukuku","tag-yargitay"],"authors":[{"term_id":96,"user_id":1,"is_guest":0,"slug":"admin","display_name":"G\u00fcnay Erdo\u011fan Attorneys-at-Law","avatar_url":{"url":"https:\/\/gunayerdogan.com.tr\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/Gunay-Erdogan-logo_300px.webp","url2x":"https:\/\/gunayerdogan.com.tr\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/Gunay-Erdogan-logo_300px.webp"},"1":"","2":"","3":"","4":"","5":"","6":"","7":"","8":""}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/gunayerdogan.com.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3333","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/gunayerdogan.com.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/gunayerdogan.com.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gunayerdogan.com.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gunayerdogan.com.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3333"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/gunayerdogan.com.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3333\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gunayerdogan.com.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/3752"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/gunayerdogan.com.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3333"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gunayerdogan.com.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3333"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gunayerdogan.com.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3333"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gunayerdogan.com.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/ppma_author?post=3333"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}